Evgeny Kuznetsov offers a candid glimpse into the cultural shock he experienced transitioning from Russian hockey to the NHL

   

Evgeny Kuznetsov’s recounting of his early experience in the NHL illuminates a profound cultural and tactical divide between Russian hockey and its North American counterpart. Trained in the Kontinental Hockey League (KHL), Kuznetsov grew up in a system where puck possession was paramount. Dumping the puck—sending it deep into the offensive zone without maintaining control—was viewed almost as a surrender, a tactic reserved for desperation or poor judgment. Coaches in the KHL demanded creativity, patience, and sustained control, and players were disciplined if they discarded the puck needlessly.

Capitals' Evgeny Kuznetsov suspended 3 games by NHL | The Seattle Times

“In my team in KHL, if you dump the puck, coach might put you on bench and you never go out and play hockey again,” Kuznetsov said then. “My first 10 games in NHL, I don’t understand why guys keep dumping puck. I’m looking at coach like, ‘Is he going to say something?’ And he’s like, happy about it. Even Ovi. I see him dump it. I’m looking at him like, ‘What?!'”

This mindset came to a sudden halt when Kuznetsov arrived in the NHL. In his first ten games, he was stunned to see teammates willingly dump the puck into the corner—sometimes under no immediate pressure. Even superstar Alexander Ovechkin did it without consequence. Kuznetsov’s disbelief turned into a humorous moment of confusion: he expected backlash from the coach, only to find that this tactic was not only accepted but often encouraged. The coach didn’t scold them; he approved of it. This realization challenged the very foundation of Kuznetsov’s hockey upbringing.

The story illustrates more than just a personal adjustment—it’s a testament to the broader tactical philosophies embedded within different leagues. In North America, dumping the puck can be a strategic move: it forces defenders to turn, wears them down, and allows aggressive forechecking. It’s about momentum and positioning rather than artistry and finesse. Kuznetsov had to unlearn certain habits and embrace a new rhythm, blending his natural skill set with a system that valued gritty pragmatism.

His adaptation speaks to the resilience and flexibility of athletes when faced with change. It also highlights how sports—even ones governed by the same rules—can carry vastly different cultural expressions. For Kuznetsov, this wasn’t just about hockey tactics—it was about decoding a new language of the game. And in doing so, he gained a deeper understanding of how varied and rich the world of hockey truly is.