It is for those reasons, and others, that Knox listed Kmet even higher on his trade big board than Pitts, naming the Kansas City Chiefs and Los Angeles Chargers as two of the top potential landing spots.
However, Kmet might make more sense for the Browns on a longterm play than Pitts for a couple of reasons. Pitts is entering the fifth-year team option of his rookie contract as a former first-rounder (No. 4 overall) and represents a cap hit of $10.9 million. Kmet costs roughly the same amount ($9.9 million base salary) in 2025, which drops to $8.9 million in each of the next two campaigns.
Pitts is going to be looking for a new contract next summer, which probably means a higher price point annually for more years than the two remaining on Kmet’s deal through 2027. So over a span of multiple seasons, Kmet may actually prove considerably cheaper, even though his total contract is technically bigger right now.
Kmet has been healthier and more productive than Pitts over the past three seasons and is just one year older. Furthermore, given Kmet’s lower profile and draft position, the Browns could potentially trade less in terms of a draft asset — likely something in the late Day-2 range to acquire him — than it would cost to get Pitts. At worst, they probably each go for a pick in the same round.