Based on their professional records, who do you think has the upper hand going into the fight between Jake Paul and Mike Tyson?

what? Paul barley has a pro record.

Paul is (9–1–0)

Those 9 victories coming against.

1. Ali Eson Gib, (A debut boxer and a nobody who has a 1–1 record now)
2. Nate Robinson, (A basketball player)
3. Ben Askren, (A 36 year old retired MMA fighter who had never boxed.)
4. Tyron Woodley, (A 39 year old retired MMA champion who had never boxed.)
5. Tyron Woodley, again.
6. Anderson Silva, (A 47 year old MMA legend with limited boxing experience.)
7. A loss to Tommy Fury, the first legit pro boxer Jake has ever fought.
8. Nate Diaz, (A 38 year old retired MMA fighter who had never boxed before.)
9. Andre August, (A bum with who almost exclusively fights boxers with losing records)
10. Ryan Bourland, (Another bum)

Paul has a disappointing record for a pro boxer and while I would call him a legit pro he’s a bottom of the barrel boxer in terms of skill and his record.

Mike Tyson.

Mike has a record of (50–6–0).

1. He was undisputed heavyweight champion.
2. He was a two time Heavyweight champion with 11 title defences.
3. Iron Mike defeated 7 former or sitting champions, 16 ranked contenders and 2 HOF boxers.

Mike Tyson was a legit HOF boxer and an ATG, while he may not be the GOAT of the heavyweight division he has an excellent record comparing his record to someone like Paul is beyond disrespectful.

Sadly Mike is a 57 year old man who is light years past his best, I would love nothing more than to see Jake get himself humiliated by an old man but I struggle to see Mike winning. Either way Paul is an undeserving scumbag who doesn’t deserve to lick Iron Mikes boots let alone get in the ring with him.