Vikings Warned Against Potentially Costly Decision on Sam Darnold

   

The Minnesota Vikings future with Sam Darnold is a polarizing topic. Bleacher Report’s Zach Buckley predicted Darnold will re-sign, in part due to uncertainty around the QB’s breakout season, in an article published on December 31.

Sam Darnold, Minnesota Vikings

Buckley’s take aligns with a report from The Athletic’s Dianna Russini on December 28 that the Vikings are indeed open to bringing Darnold back, and he wants to return.

However, ESPN’s Dan Graziano does not see that happening.

“I think it’s going to be very expensive to keep him, and I don’t know – they have the 10th pick in this year’s draft on the roster. I know he got hurt, he couldn’t play. But I think – this is the best year Sam Darnold’s ever had, like easily, right?” Graziano told Mike Greenberg on “Get Up” on December 31.

“He’s 13th in QBR. [The] 13th highest-paid quarterback right now makes $45 million a year. Is that what you’re paying for Sam Darnold – or more? You want to pay him $50 [million] a year? You have a guy on your roster, who has to be your starter at some point soon.”

Graziano believes that Darnold will ultimately find a team willing to pay him more in free agency than the Vikings.

The Vikings can franchise tag Darnold. But Graziano advises against paying the QB big money.

“If you play roulette and you put all your money on number 17, and it comes up and you hit it, you don’t put it all right back on 17. You keep the money. The reason you pay Justin Jefferson $36 million a year and you know you can get away with that is because you know you’re going to have a rookie quarterback contract for the next three or four years of J.J. McCarthy. I don’t think Sam Darnold fits with the Vikings’ long-term team-building philosophy.

“Unless he’s willing to take a team-friendly deal, I don’t think it’s a responsible decision to bring him back.”

Vikings’ Faith in Kevin O’Connell Just as Key to Sam Darnold’s Future as J.J. McCarthy